![nvidia quadro fx 1500 win 10 nvidia quadro fx 1500 win 10](https://i.redd.it/5l377hbrino61.png)
- Nvidia quadro fx 1500 win 10 drivers#
- Nvidia quadro fx 1500 win 10 driver#
- Nvidia quadro fx 1500 win 10 32 bit#
- Nvidia quadro fx 1500 win 10 Patch#
That could mean that the Quadro drivers are 10,000% more efficient at implementing AA in games, or more likely the AA effects were not being applied at all.
Nvidia quadro fx 1500 win 10 driver#
I thought I was chewing through Quake II at 1600x1200 with 16xAA, but once I flashed my card to a geforce and set AA in the driver I found my framerate plummeted. One interesting thing I noticed is that forcing AA through the nvidia control panel on my card as quadro didn't seem to do anything. I also find that the nvida control panel settings are more useful and relevant to gaming when it thinks you have a geforce. Setting my card to a geforce has made everything more consistent and has made comparing my performance to other machines easier. From these numbers, are you able to discern the difference during actual gameplay? Or do you need a more demanding game for the benefits of the flash to be more apparent? I have a Quadro FX3000 but left it as a Quadro. Phil tested the same card and found that Quadro and FX performed pretty much the same, but he also found that 45.23 performed the same as 56.64, so there are definitely some differences in my experience from his. So for me, proper configuration literally doubled my fps.
Nvidia quadro fx 1500 win 10 Patch#
On patch 45.23, with a fresh intall of quake on patch 3.05, I got 119fps in Quake II at 640x480. I think the base clock on my gpu was 300mhz on the core, and it overclocked to 469mhz just using the auto setting (very likely can go higher, no idea though). I saw a 20fps increase by applying the Quake II patches, so I probably would have got 200fps with the Quadro on the same drivers. Upgrading to patch 3.20 and installing the 3DNow! patch also helped, as did upgrading my drivers to version 56.64, and overclocking. The highest score I got in quake II was 180 fps with the Quadro FX, but this was on quake II patch 3.05. If you leave it setup as a Quadro FX2000, how much does the framerate drop? Game 1 - Adventure - High Detail 100.6fps Reply 1 of 25, by feipoaģ) Installed Rivatuner, and setup my Quadro to run as a FX 5800. Game 1 - Helicopter - Medium Detail 196.9fps Game 1 - Helicopter - Low Detail 256.4fps I should be getting at least 50 frames all the way up to 1600x1200 correct? I am also unable to get more than 180fps in quake II no matter what settings I run at.
Nvidia quadro fx 1500 win 10 32 bit#
My average FPS with 32 bit colors, in D3D and 1024x768 is 12.13 fps in the flyover timedemo. of China Hungary India Indonesia Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Kuwait Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Macao S.A.R.I am getting much less than expected performance on my windows 98 machine, in particular with Unreal Gold. Anguilla Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Aruba Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Bermuda Bolivia Brazil Bulgaria Canada Cayman Islands Chile China Mainland Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong S.A.R.of China Malaysia Mexico Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Oman Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Romania Russian Federation Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Saudi Arabia Serbia Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Suriname Sweden Switzerland Taiwan Region Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Turks and Caicos Islands Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States of America Uruguay US Downloads Venezuela Vietnam Virgin Islands, British of China Hungary India Indonesia Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Kuwait Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Macao S.A.R.